Articles or studies whose authors are named are often — though not always — more reliable than works produced anonymously. It makes sense: If someone is willing to put their name on something they've written, chances are they stand by the information it contains. And if you have the name of the author, you can always Google them to check their credentials.
Evaluating Cms.Gov Website for Credibility Essay
Reputable websites often link to each other. You can find out which other websites link to the site you're researching by conducting a link-specific Google search. The search results will show you which websites link to the one you're researching. If lots of sites are linking to your site, and those sites seem reputable, then that's a good sign.
Share Flipboard Email. Tony Rogers has an M. He has written and taught journalism for over 25 years. Foreign policy of a certain state or province.
How to Write an Evaluation Essay | urunsakinleu.ml
Deeds of a famous historical figure. Service quality. A museum. A piece of art.
Key Points to Consider No matter how enthusiastic or negative your attitude is towards the chosen topic, the general tone of your essay should be reasonable. You can use quotations, personal experiences, descriptions, or comparisons with similar objects as evidence.
An evaluation essay is not about giving an unbiased point of view—you come up with an evaluative thesis and provide evidence in its defense. The more controversial your subject is, the more supporting arguments you might need. It is also useful to present the opposite point of view. In this way, you will show you are aware that other opinions on the topic also exist. When choosing your topic, remember that some subjects are maybe interesting for one group of people, but could be completely uninteresting for another one.
Do pick at least criteria to make an assessment. The more criteria you come up with, the more exact and clear your viewpoint becomes for your readers. Do make sure your evidence is balanced between the criteria. Your essay will look much better if you find credible arguments for each of your criterion. Avoid situations when you use one strong piece of evidence for one criterion and none for others.
Do find the conventional standard within the topic you have chosen to use as a model for distinguishing your own points and writing an essay. Do use proper grammar and punctuation, and proofread your essay carefully. Use catching verbs and vivacious nouns in your arguments. Avoid being too general or stating the obvious. For example, when describing a restaurant, you might write that the cuisine was delicious and the atmosphere was sophisticated, but at the same time the service quality could be better and the location of the restaurant was chosen poorly.
- poverty class and gender in rural africa a tanzanian case study.
- Evaluating Internet Information.
- Evaluating Websites: What You Need to Know to Find Great Sources.
- press and public opinion essay!
Ask an expert for FREE. Popular Questions Thesis statement and compare contrast essay asked by Admin What is a good thesis statement against euthanasia asked by Anonymous Gender stereotypes persuasive essay asked by Admin Which of the following would best work as the title of an explanatory essay? Samples for Writing an Evaluation Essay In , a renowned British journalist, George Orwell, wrote his famous novel , in which he described a totalitarian society where people had no freedo Speaking of the latt Crime and punishment are two categories that are almost always associated with one another.
They have become subjects of numerous scientific research studies and literary works. Login Username Password or login with. Register Username Email What is your profession? Some questions you might ask would include, What about this source makes it believable or not? How does this source know this information? Why should I believe this source over another?
As you can see, the key to credibility is the question of trust. The author or source of the information should show some evidence of being knowledgeable, reliable, and truthful. Author's position job function, title Note: Mere fame is not an indicator of credibility.
Most scholarly journal articles pass through a peer review process, whereby several readers must examine and approve content before it is published. Statements issued in the name of an organization have almost always been seen and approved by several people. But note the difference between, "Allan Thornton, employee of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Agency, says that a new ice age is near," and "The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Agency said today that a new ice age is near.
Don't assume that a great-looking Web site is automatically credible. Very professional and sophisticated Web page templates are available for a few dollars, so that anyone and his pet skunk can put up a site that looks expensive and authoritative. Good looks are not evidence of credibility.
Metainformation is information about information. Information workers sometimes called knowledge workers all over the world are constantly poring over, processing, and evaluating information--and making notes. As the challenges produced by the increasing quantity of information continue, access to high quality metainformation will become increasingly important.
Metainformation can take many forms, but there are two basic types, summary and evaluative. Indicators of Lack of Credibility. You can sometimes tell by the tone, style, or competence of the writing whether or not the information is suspect. If all the reviews are critical, be careful.
Bad grammar or misspelled words. Most educated people use grammar fairly well and check their work for spelling errors. An occasional split infinitive or comma in the wrong place is not unusual, but more than two or three spelling or grammar errors is cause for caution, at least. Whether the errors come from carelessness or ignorance, neither puts the information or the writer in a favorable light.
Emotional earnestness accompanied by exaggeration or absolutes.
Essay about Website Evaluation
Even in very controversial areas gun control, global warming, abortion, capital punishment and promotional contexts product claims and evaluations we expect reasons, data, and emotional restraint. Articles where the writer's feelings have clearly taken over from thinking make us wonder if we are reading ideology instead of information and arguments that might persuade us. Breathless, sweeping generalizations should set off your baloney detector. For example, "Did you know that none of the vitamins and supplements sold in stores work correctly with your body chemistry?
Only SuperDuperVite has been formulated to blah blah blah. The goal of the accuracy test is to assure that the information is actually correct: up to date, factual, detailed, exact, and comprehensive. For example, even though a very credible writer said something that was correct twenty years ago, it may not be correct today. Similarly, a reputable source might be giving up-to-date information, but the information may be only partial, and not give the full story.
Here are some concepts related to accuracy:. Some work is timeless, like the classic novels and stories, or like the thought provoking philosophical work of Aristotle and Plato. Other work has a limited useful life because of advances in the discipline psychological theory, for example , and some work is outdated very quickly such as technology news. You must therefore be careful to note when the information you find was created, and then decide whether it is still of value and how much value. You may need information within the past ten years, five years, or even two weeks.
But old is not necessarily bad: nineteenth-century American history books or literary anthologies can be highly educational because they can function as comparisons with what is being written or anthologized now. In many cases, though, you want accurate, up-to-date information. Any source that presents conclusions or that claims explicitly or implicitly to give a full and rounded story, should reflect the intentions of completeness and accuracy. In other words, the information should be comprehensive.
Some writers argue that researchers should be sure that they have "complete" information before making a decision or that information must be complete. But with the advent of the information age, such a goal is impossible, if by "complete" we mean all possible information. No one can read 20, articles on the same subject before coming to a conclusion or making a decision. And no single piece of information will offer the truly complete story--that's why we rely on more than one source.
On the other hand, an information source that deliberately leaves out important facts, qualifications, consequences, or alternatives may be misleading or even intentionally deceptive.